Radeon 780M vs GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1582	349
Place by popularity	not in top-100	47
Power efficiency	no data	84.14
Architecture	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code name	Pineview	Phoenix
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (18 years ago)	31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	768
Core clock speed	400 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	123 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	139.2
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	32
TMUs	2	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCI	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Motherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.8
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	35
1440p	no data	22
4K	no data	13

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	31 January 2024
Chip lithography	45 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	15 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---