UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs FireStream 9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FireStream 9350 FireStream 9370 V7800 V7800P V8800 V9800 V9800P
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9370 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

FireStream 9370
2010
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.05
+40%

FireStream 9370 outperforms Graphics G4 48EUs by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking642718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.0711.88
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameCypressTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 June 2010 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160048
Core clock speed825 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate66.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1150 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+31.3%
16
−31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • FireStream 9370 is 31% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.05 4.32
Recency 23 June 2010 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 28 Watt

FireStream 9370 has a 40% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 704% lower power consumption.

The FireStream 9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that FireStream 9370 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
HD 7560G IGP HD 7560G IGP
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
GeForce4 MX + nForce2 GeForce4 MX + nForce2
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q RTX 4000 Max-Q
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
RX 5500 OEM RX 5500 OEM
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 558 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9370 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.