GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs FireStream 9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FireStream 9350 FireStream 9370 V7800 V7800P V8800 V9800 V9800P
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1650 Mobile 1650 Max-Q 1650 Mobile Refresh 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Mobile 1660 Max-Q 1660 Mobile 1660 Ti Mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9370 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

FireStream 9370
2010
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.04

1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms FireStream 9370 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking634301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.94
Power efficiency2.0627.00
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCypressTU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 June 2010 (15 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16001536
Core clock speed825 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate66.00128.2
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8096
L1 Cache160 KB1.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FireStream 9370 6.04
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 21.08
+249%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FireStream 9370 2528
Samples: 1
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+249%
Samples: 1475

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−276%
79
+276%
4K9−10
−267%
33
+267%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.90
4Kno data6.94

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+0%
87
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how FireStream 9370 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 276% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 267% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.04 21.08
Recency 23 June 2010 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 249% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9370 in performance tests.

Be aware that FireStream 9370 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
P106-090 P106 090
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
GT 120M Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
9600M GT Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
Go 6600 TE NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 TE
vs
Pro V340 MxGPU Pro V340 MxGPU
FX Go5200 NPB 32M NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
FX Go5650 NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650
vs
ATI X1950 PRO Radeon X1950 PRO
FireStream 9350 AMD FireStream 9350
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
FireStream 9270 AMD FireStream 9270
vs
RX 5900 RX 5900
FireStream 9250 AMD FireStream 9250
vs
RX 5900 RX 5900
ATI V9800 ATI FirePro V9800
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
ATI V3800 ATI FirePro V3800
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 599 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9370 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.