Arc A730M vs FireStream 9350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.57
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCypressDG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2010 (15 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14403072
Core clock speed700 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40393.6
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs72192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache144 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A730M has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9350 and Arc A730M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9350 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A730M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 117 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9350 or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.