GeForce GTX 1630 vs FireStream 9270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9270 with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

FireStream 9270
2008
2 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
3.21

GTX 1630 outperforms FireStream 9270 by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking796448
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5412.24
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV770TU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800512
Core clock speed750 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors956 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0057.12
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032
L1 Cache160 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FireStream 9270 3.21
GTX 1630 11.93
+272%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FireStream 9270 1341
Samples: 4
GTX 1630 4988
+272%
Samples: 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.21 11.93
Recency 13 November 2008 28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1630 has a 271.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9270 in performance tests.

Be aware that FireStream 9270 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1487 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9270 or GeForce GTX 1630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.