GRID M60-4A vs FireStream 9270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking788not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV770GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2008 (17 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002048
Core clock speed750 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors956 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate30.00150.8
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40128
L1 Cache160 KB768 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2008 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 225 Watt

FireStream 9270 has 40.6% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-4A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9270 and GRID M60-4A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270
NVIDIA GRID M60-4A
GRID M60-4A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9270 or GRID M60-4A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.