RTX A400 vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9250 and RTX A400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FireStream 9250
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.78

RTX A400 outperforms FireStream 9250 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking845400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4322.05
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV770GA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed625 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors956 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0042.29
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FireStream 9250 2.78
RTX A400 14.33
+415%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FireStream 9250 1164
Samples: 2
RTX A400 5991
+415%
Samples: 446

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.78 14.33
Recency 16 June 2008 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

RTX A400 has a 415.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9250 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 47 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.