Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking841not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRV770NV17 A3
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed625 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors956 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate25.000.88 ×2
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162 ×2
TMUs404 ×2
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed993 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s5.312 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 18 Watt

FireStream 9250 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.