Radeon RX Vega 3 vs ATI FirePro V9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated846
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Power efficiencyno data14.08
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCypressRaven 2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 September 2010 (15 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600192
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0012.13
Floating-point processing power2.72 TFLOPS0.3882 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs8012
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2010 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V9800 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V9800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2238 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V9800 or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.