Quadro T1200 Mobile vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9270 V7760 V7770 V8700 V8700 Duo V8750
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9250 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FireStream 9250
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.78

T1200 Mobile outperforms FireStream 9250 by a whopping 523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking844348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4273.94
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV770TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001024
Core clock speed625 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors956 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0091.20
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
L1 Cache160 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−544%
58
+544%
1440p5−6
−560%
33
+560%
4K12−14
−575%
81
+575%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how FireStream 9250 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 544% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 560% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 575% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.78 17.32
Recency 16 June 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 523% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9250 in performance tests.

Be aware that FireStream 9250 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
vs
GRID K340 GRID K340
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
FX Go5650 FX Go5650
vs
9300 GS Rev. 2 9300 GS Rev. 2
FX Go5650 FX Go5650
vs
9500 GT Mac Edition 9500 GT Mac Edition
FX Go5650 FX Go5650
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 2
GeForce2 Go 100 GeForce2 Go 100
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
GeForce2 Go 100 GeForce2 Go 100
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
Stream Processor Stream Processor
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
ATI V9800P V9800P
vs
FX 4000 FX 4000
ATI V7800 V7800
vs
Plex 2100 S4 Plex 2100 S4
ATI V7800 V7800
vs
FX 4000 FX 4000
ATI V3750 V3750
vs
RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 160 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.