A800 SXM4 80 GB vs FireStream 9250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.39no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV770GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (16 years ago)11 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8006912
Core clock speed625 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors956 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00609.1
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs40432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 11 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 400 Watt

FireStream 9250 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

A800 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and A800 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate A800 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.