A100 SXM4 vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking847not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.43no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV770GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8006912
Core clock speed625 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors956 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00609.1
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs40432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache160 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount1 GB40 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 400 Watt

FireStream 9250 has 167% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.