GeForce 210 PCI vs FirePro W9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.17no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameHawaiiGT216
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 March 2014 (11 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281616
Core clock speed930 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate163.73.800
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1768
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length275 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2014 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 31 Watt

FirePro W9100 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

210 PCI, on the other hand, has 2319.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W9100 and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W9100
FirePro W9100
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 18 votes

Rate FirePro W9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9100 or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.