GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs FirePro W9000

Place in performance ranking	316	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	75
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.37	21.26
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Tahiti	AD103-400-A1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 June 2012 (12 years ago)	31 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,999	$999
Current price	$877 (0.2x MSRP)	$1202 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 531% better value for money than FirePro W9000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	10240
Core clock speed	975 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	124.8	816.0
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	279 mm	310 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Form factor	full height / full length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	23000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+
StereoOutput3D	1	no data
Dual-link DVI support	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W9000 15.89

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.29
+456%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms FirePro W9000 by 456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W9000 6138

RTX 4080 SUPER 34094
+455%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms FirePro W9000 by 455% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −464%	254 +464%
1440p	30−35 −497%	179 +497%
4K	21−24 −457%	117 +457%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −488%	235 +488%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −462%	281 +462%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −510%	240−250 +510%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −471%	120−130 +471%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −462%	110−120 +462%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −474%	200−210 +474%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −473%	344 +473%
Hitman 3	21−24 −486%	120−130 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −459%	503 +459%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −459%	150−160 +459%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −490%	120−130 +490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −458%	614 +458%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −525%	150−160 +525%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −506%	212 +506%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −493%	237 +493%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −510%	240−250 +510%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −471%	120−130 +471%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −462%	110−120 +462%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −474%	200−210 +474%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −500%	270−280 +500%
Hitman 3	21−24 −486%	120−130 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −471%	350−400 +471%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −494%	95 +494%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −490%	120−130 +490%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −468%	568 +468%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 −476%	547 +476%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −525%	150−160 +525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −485%	158 +485%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −497%	209 +497%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −471%	120−130 +471%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −462%	110−120 +462%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −485%	322 +485%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −467%	425 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −486%	527 +486%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −484%	263 +484%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −504%	145 +504%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
−490%

120−130

+490%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −515%	160−170 +515%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −500%	140−150 +500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −463%	135 +463%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −511%	165 +511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −522%	110−120 +522%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −509%	213 +509%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −456%	306 +456%
Hitman 3	21−24 −514%	120−130 +514%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −475%	345 +475%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −470%	171 +470%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −467%	397 +467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −531%	221 +531%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −505%	127 +505%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
−514%

120−130

+514%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −475%	65−70 +475%
Hitman 3	14−16 −493%	80−85 +493%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −463%	169 +463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −463%	135 +463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −483%	204 +483%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −500%	96 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −519%	99 +519%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −478%	50−55 +478%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −510%	305 +510%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −489%	206 +489%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −492%	142 +492%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −479%	81 +479%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
−517%

110−120

+517%

This is how FirePro W9000 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 464% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 497% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 457% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.89	88.29
Recency	14 June 2012	31 January 2024
Cost	$3999	$999
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	320 Watt