ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs FirePro W8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking363not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameHawaiiRV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 June 2014 (11 years ago)25 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed824 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate131.81.300
Floating-point processing power4.219 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1604
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2014 25 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 30 Watt

FirePro W8100 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory, on the other hand, has 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W8100 and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W8100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 22 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W8100 or Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.