Radeon RX 6750 XT vs FirePro W8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8000 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
10.60

RX 6750 XT outperforms FirePro W8000 by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking40240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0230.06
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiNavi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 June 2012 (12 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $549
Current price$215 (0.1x MSRP)$559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 399% better value for money than FirePro W8000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed900 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8416.0
Floating-point performance3,226 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W8000 10.60
RX 6750 XT 53.80
+408%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms FirePro W8000 by 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W8000 4095
RX 6750 XT 20776
+407%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms FirePro W8000 by 407% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−427%
158
+427%
1440p16−18
−450%
88
+450%
4K10−12
−420%
52
+420%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 165
−385%
800−850
+385%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−406%
450−500
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−384%
450−500
+384%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−397%
850−900
+397%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−381%
500−550
+381%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
−372%
600−650
+372%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−376%
500−550
+376%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−400%
650−700
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−395%
900−950
+395%
Hitman 3 100−110
−367%
500−550
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 376
−405%
1900−1950
+405%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−392%
650−700
+392%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−382%
550−600
+382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 368
−403%
1850−1900
+403%
Watch Dogs: Legion 135
−381%
650−700
+381%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−406%
450−500
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−384%
450−500
+384%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−397%
850−900
+397%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−381%
500−550
+381%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
−405%
550−600
+405%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−376%
500−550
+376%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−400%
650−700
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−395%
900−950
+395%
Hitman 3 100−110
−367%
500−550
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−391%
1100−1150
+391%
Metro Exodus 72
−386%
350−400
+386%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−382%
550−600
+382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
−393%
1500−1550
+393%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
−390%
1200−1250
+390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−370%
550−600
+370%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−406%
450−500
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−384%
450−500
+384%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−381%
500−550
+381%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
−359%
450−500
+359%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−376%
500−550
+376%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−395%
900−950
+395%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
−400%
1050−1100
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260
−400%
1300−1350
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
−381%
650−700
+381%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
−359%
450−500
+359%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−382%
550−600
+382%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−391%
550−600
+391%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−380%
600−650
+380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−400%
300−310
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−376%
300−310
+376%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−371%
400−450
+371%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−400%
300−310
+400%
Far Cry 5 141
−396%
700−750
+396%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−400%
600−650
+400%
Hitman 3 75−80
−367%
350−400
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 158
−406%
800−850
+406%
Metro Exodus 126
−376%
600−650
+376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
−384%
900−950
+384%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−355%
400−450
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 73
−379%
350−400
+379%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−389%
450−500
+389%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−392%
290−300
+392%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−390%
240−250
+390%
Hitman 3 45−50
−389%
220−230
+389%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−367%
350−400
+367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
−400%
300−310
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
−406%
400−450
+406%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−400%
200−210
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−400%
190−200
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−386%
180−190
+386%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−400%
130−140
+400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−400%
400−450
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
−400%
450−500
+400%
Metro Exodus 82
−388%
400−450
+388%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
−388%
200−210
+388%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−400%
260−270
+400%

This is how FirePro W8000 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 427% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 450% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 420% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.60 53.80
Recency 14 June 2012 3 March 2022
Cost $1599 $549
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2206 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.