Radeon RX 560 vs FirePro W8000

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

FirePro W8000
10.57
+12.2%

FirePro W8000 outperforms Radeon RX 560 by 12% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking396432
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Value for money5.521.68
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 June 2012 (11 years old)18 April 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $99
Current price$215 (0.1x MSRP)$381 (3.8x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W8000 has 229% better value for money than RX 560.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed900 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1275 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate100.881.60
Floating-point performance3,226 gflops2,611 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mm170 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W8000 10.57
+12.2%
RX 560 9.42

FirePro W8000 outperforms Radeon RX 560 by 12% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W8000 4095
+12.2%
RX 560 3650

FirePro W8000 outperforms Radeon RX 560 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+0%
35
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.57 9.42
Recency 14 June 2012 18 April 2017
Cost $1599 $99
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt

The FirePro W8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 560 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2420 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.