NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs AMD FirePro W8000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro W8000
2012
4096 MB GDDR5
10.57
+15.4%

FirePro W8000 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking397441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.582.85
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameTahitiGM107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 June 2012 (11 years old)22 July 2014 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $395.75
Current price$215 (0.1x MSRP)$313 (0.8x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W8000 has 96% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed900 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate100.844.96
Floating-point performance3,226 gflops1,439 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mm202 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W8000 10.57
+15.4%
Quadro K2200 9.16

FirePro W8000 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W8000 4095
+15.4%
Quadro K2200 3550

FirePro W8000 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 15% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.57 9.16
Recency 14 June 2012 22 July 2014
Cost $1599 $395.75
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 68 Watt

The FirePro W8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 335 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.