Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs FirePro W7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4100 W4300 W5000 W5000 DVI W5100 W7000 W7100 W8000 W8100 W9000 W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7100 with Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 400 Watt
13.85
+799%

W7100 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 799% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4061006
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.09no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameTongano data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (11 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792736
Core clock speed920 MHz655 / 600 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Wattno data
Texture fill rate103.0no data
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p200−210
+770%
23
−770%
Full HD150−160
+782%
17
−782%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
+0%
44
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how FirePro W7100 and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W7100 is 770% faster in 900p
  • FirePro W7100 is 782% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.85 1.54
Recency 12 August 2014 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

FirePro W7100 has a 799.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W7100
FirePro W7100
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
vs
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7690M XT HD 7690M XT
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 8730M HD 8730M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7690M HD 7690M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7670M HD 7670M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7660G HD 7660G
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7650M HD 7650M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
HD 7570M HD 7570M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 79 votes

Rate FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7100 or Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.