Radeon RX 6650 XT vs FirePro W7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7000 with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7000
2012, $899
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
10.29

6650 XT outperforms W7000 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking476108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.8858.25
Power efficiency5.2717.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)10 May 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6650 XT has 6519% better value for money than FirePro W7000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speed950 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00337.3
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache320 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W7000 10.29
RX 6650 XT 41.00
+298%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W7000 4304
Samples: 279
RX 6650 XT 17157
+299%
Samples: 4415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−360%
138
+360%
1440p16−18
−331%
69
+331%
4K9−10
−300%
36
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.97
−936%
2.89
+936%
1440p56.19
−872%
5.78
+872%
4K99.89
−801%
11.08
+801%
  • RX 6650 XT has 936% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT has 872% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT has 801% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 198
+0%
198
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how FirePro W7000 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 360% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 331% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.29 41.00
Recency 13 June 2012 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 176 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 298.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 98.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Tesla K20m Tesla K20m
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
vs
Instinct MI350X MI350X
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 360 GPU
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
Tesla T10 Processor T10 Processor
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 2080 Ti
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB 3050 4 GB
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 3 450 Rev. 3
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 2 450 Rev. 2
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
Tesla P40 P40
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
GTS 240 OEM 240 OEM
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
P106-090 090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 62 votes

Rate FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4010 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7000 or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.