Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs FirePro W7000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro W7000 and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro W6800X Duo outperforms W7000 by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 476 | 157 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.88 | 2.83 |
| Power efficiency | 5.27 | 6.76 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Pitcairn | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 3 August 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $4,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Pro W6800X Duo has 222% better value for money than FirePro W7000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 3840 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1967 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,800 million | 26,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 472.1 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.432 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 240 ×2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 60 ×2 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 960 KB |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 128 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Apple MPX |
| Length | 242 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | Quad-slot |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s ×2 |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt |
| HDMI | - | + |
| StereoOutput3D | + | - |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | no data |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.29 | 35.23 |
| Recency | 13 June 2012 | 3 August 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
FirePro W7000 has 14.3% lower power consumption.
Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has a 242.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
