GeForce 9800 GT vs FirePro W7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7000 with GeForce 9800 GT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7000
2012, $899
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
10.31
+804%

W7000 outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 804% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4791116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.880.06
Power efficiency5.280.70
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePitcairnG92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

FirePro W7000 has 1367% better value for money than 9800 GT.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280112
Core clock speed950 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate76.0033.60
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8056
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length242 mm229 mm
Heightno data1-slot
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W7000 10.31
+804%
9800 GT 1.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W7000 4311
+802%
Samples: 283
9800 GT 478
Samples: 3476

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.31 1.14
Recency 13 June 2012 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 105 Watt

FirePro W7000 has a 804.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9800 GT, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 62 votes

Rate FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1625 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7000 or GeForce 9800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.