HD Graphics 4200 vs FirePro W5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4100 W4300 W5000 W5000 DVI W5100 W7000 W7100 W8000 W8100 W9000 W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 3000 4000 4200 4400 4600 5000 5300 5500 5600 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5100 with HD Graphics 4200, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W5100
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.21
+692%

W5100 outperforms HD Graphics 4200 by a whopping 692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5861182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.0617.46
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameBonaireHaswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 March 2014 (11 years ago)2 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768160
Core clock speed930 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate44.6417.00
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS0.272 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs4820
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+650%
8
−650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how FirePro W5100 and HD Graphics 4200 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W5100 is 650% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.21 0.91
Recency 31 March 2014 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 4 Watt

FirePro W5100 has a 692.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

HD Graphics 4200, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5100 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W5100
FirePro W5100
Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4200
vs
8800M GTS GeForce 8800M GTS
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
HD 7690M XT Rebrand HD 7690M XT Rebrand
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
FX 5700 FX 5700
FirePro S9100 FirePro S9100
vs
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
FirePro S9050 FirePro S9050
vs
RX 5950 XT RX 5950 XT
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
GTS 450 GTS 450
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RX 6500 RX 6500
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU Graphics 48EU
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
R7 430 OEM R7 430 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 126 votes

Rate FirePro W5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5100 or HD Graphics 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.