GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs FirePro W5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FirePro W5100
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.80

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms FirePro W5100 by a whopping 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking489122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0019.18
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameBonaireN18E-G2R
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 March 2014 (10 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$220 $1443

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has 539% better value for money than FirePro W5100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed930 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64220.8
Floating-point performance1,428 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W5100 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz14002 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−396%
119
+396%
1440p14−16
−414%
72
+414%
4K10−12
−370%
47
+370%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.80 36.46
Recency 31 March 2014 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5100
FirePro W5100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate FirePro W5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 386 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.