UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4000 W4100 W4130M W4150M W4300 W5000 W5100 W7000 W7100 W8100 W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4300 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4300
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.92
+75.2%

W4300 outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking593747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBonaireTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2015 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed930 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate44.64no data
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FirePro W4300 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W4300 is 69% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.92 3.95
Recency 1 December 2015 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

FirePro W4300 has a 75.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
vs
Instinct MI50 MI50
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
vs
RTX 4060 4060
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
HD Graphics 4600 4600
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
R7 360 896SP 360 896SP
FirePro S9100 FirePro S9100
vs
RTX 4080 Max-Q 4080 Max-Q
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RX 6400 6400
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
T1200 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q
FirePro S9150 FirePro S9150
vs
Quadro P520 P520
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
K5100M K5100M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.