Radeon RX 9060 XT vs FirePro W4300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking564not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBonaireNavi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (9 years ago)18 May 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed930 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3230 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64413.4
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length171 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2015 18 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 9060 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 81 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.