Radeon PRO V710 vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBonaireNavi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2015 (8 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683456
Core clock speed930 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64432.0
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs48216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2015 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 158 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 216% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 21 vote

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.