RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs FirePro W4190M

Place in the ranking	783	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.88
Power efficiency	no data	44.39
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Opal	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 November 2015 (9 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2816
Core clock speed	825 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	187.4
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	24	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W4190M 2.99

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.20
+1412%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W4190M 1150

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17377
+1411%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

W4190M 5166

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 86216
+1569%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1362%

190−200
+1362%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Elden Ring	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1400%	210−220 +1400%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Valorant	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Dota 2	8 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Elden Ring	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1371%	250−260 +1371%
Fortnite	16−18 −1371%	250−260 +1371%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1400%	210−220 +1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	12 −1400%	180−190 +1400%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	33 −1264%	450−500 +1264%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Valorant	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
World of Tanks	50−55 −1409%	800−850 +1409%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Dota 2	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1371%	250−260 +1371%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1400%	210−220 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −1381%	400−450 +1381%
Valorant	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Elden Ring	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −1329%	300−310 +1329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1329%	300−310 +1329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −1306%	450−500 +1306%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Valorant	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1400%	240−250 +1400%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1367%	220−230 +1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1400%	240−250 +1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Dota 2	16−18 −1400%	240−250 +1400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Fortnite	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Valorant	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%

This is how W4190M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1362% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.99	45.20
Recency	12 November 2015	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 1411.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4190M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.