UHD Graphics 730 vs FirePro W2100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.35

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms W2100 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849688
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Power efficiency6.2419.18
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameOlandRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed630 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6018.60
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs2012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.35
UHD Graphics 730 4.17
+77.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
UHD Graphics 730 1603
+77.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
4K2
−50%
3−4
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Elden Ring 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Elden Ring 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Fortnite 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
World of Tanks 40−45
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
World of Tanks 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Valorant 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how FirePro W2100 and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 730 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 4.17
Recency 12 August 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has a 77.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1297 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.