GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro W2100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.35

GTX 1650 outperforms W2100 by a whopping 771% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849272
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.80
Power efficiency6.2418.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameOlandTU117
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Core clock speed630 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6093.24
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.35
GTX 1650 20.48
+771%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
GTX 1650 7875
+772%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W2100 1085
GTX 1650 9203
+748%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro W2100 7771
GTX 1650 50549
+550%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro W2100 3710
GTX 1650 39154
+955%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

FirePro W2100 4490
GTX 1650 35853
+699%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−431%
69
+431%
1440p4−5
−900%
40
+900%
4K2
−1050%
23
+1050%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.73
4Kno data6.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Elden Ring 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1220%
66
+1220%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−240%
17
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−683%
94
+683%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−756%
77
+756%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
Dota 2 5−6
−1540%
82
+1540%
Elden Ring 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−543%
90
+543%
Fortnite 12−14
−583%
82
+583%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−517%
74
+517%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−523%
130−140
+523%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
World of Tanks 40−45
−434%
230−240
+434%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55
+1000%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Dota 2 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−386%
65−70
+386%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−417%
62
+417%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−177%
61
+177%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−975%
170−180
+975%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
World of Tanks 14−16
−827%
130−140
+827%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7
+133%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Valorant 8−9
−400%
40
+400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
29
+81.3%
Elden Ring 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−786%
60−65
+786%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−93.3%
29
+93.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3
+200%
Dota 2 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Fortnite 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21
+950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 85
+0%
85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 431% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 900% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 1050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 20.48
Recency 12 August 2014 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 188.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 771.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24310 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.