Quadro FX 4000 vs ATI FirePro V8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameCypressNV40
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 April 2010 (15 years ago)1 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600no data
Core clock speed825 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)208 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate66.004.500
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs8012
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 April 2010 1 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 208 Watt 142 Watt

ATI V8800 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

FX 4000, on the other hand, has 46.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8800 and Quadro FX 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Quadro FX 4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8800 or Quadro FX 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.