GeForce 9500 GT vs ATI FirePro V8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV770G96
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $85.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80032
Core clock speed750 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors956 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate30.009.600
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mm175 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoDual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

ATI V8700 has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GT, on the other hand, has 202% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 and GeForce 9500 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9500 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1342 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 or GeForce 9500 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.