Arc A370M vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.76
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV770DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001024
Core clock speed750 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors956 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3.4 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A370M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 331.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V8700 Duo and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V8700 Duo is a workstation graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
FirePro V8700 Duo
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V8700 Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V8700 Duo or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.