Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid vs FirePro V7900
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 580 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.84 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | GCN 1.4 (2017) |
| GPU code name | Cayman | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 27 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,499 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,640 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 151 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 58.00 | 409.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.856 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1886 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 482.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
| StereoOutput3D | + | - |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | no data |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 May 2011 | 27 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 151 Watt | 375 Watt |
FirePro V7900 has 148.3% lower power consumption.
Vega Frontier Edition Liquid, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
