Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs FirePro V7900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking581not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.76no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameCaymanCondor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed725 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Wattno data
Texture fill rate58.000.25
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs802

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length279 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4None
OpenCL1.2None
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

FirePro V7900 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 16 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.