GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V7900 with GeForce RTX 2060 Super, including specs and performance data.


FirePro V7900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.40

RTX 2060 Super outperforms V7900 by a whopping 630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking663124
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.33
Power efficiency2.7717.35
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCaymanTU106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)9 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802176
Core clock speed725 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00224.4
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache320 KB2.1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V7900 5.40
RTX 2060 Super 39.42
+630%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V7900 2260
Samples: 80
RTX 2060 Super 16465
+629%
Samples: 11713

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−700%
112
+700%
1440p8−9
−713%
65
+713%
4K5−6
−760%
43
+760%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.56
1440pno data6.14
4Kno data9.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 320
+0%
320
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 118
+0%
118
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 285
+0%
285
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Fortnite 266
+0%
266
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 152
+0%
152
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
+0%
147
+0%
Valorant 298
+0%
298
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Dota 2 200
+0%
200
+0%
Far Cry 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Fortnite 175
+0%
175
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+0%
147
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+0%
143
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+0%
163
+0%
Valorant 293
+0%
293
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Dota 2 185
+0%
185
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 148
+0%
148
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 268
+0%
268
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Valorant 210
+0%
210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+0%
67
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+0%
49
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 48
+0%
48
+0%

This is how FirePro V7900 and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 700% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 713% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 760% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 39.42
Recency 24 May 2011 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 175 Watt

FirePro V7900 has 16% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 630% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 18 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 15753 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or GeForce RTX 2060 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.