Quadro T500 Mobile vs ATI FirePro V5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
V3700 V3750 V3800 V4800 V5700 V5800 V5800 DVI V7800 V8700 V8800 V9800 V9800P
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5800 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI V5800
2010, $479
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.38

T500 Mobile outperforms V5800 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking789555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency3.5235.29
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJuniperTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date26 April 2010 (16 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800896
Core clock speed690 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6094.92
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4056
L1 Cache80 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−157%
36
+157%
1440p6−7
−150%
15
+150%
4K6−7
−183%
17
+183%

Cost per frame, $

1080p34.21no data
1440p79.83no data
4K79.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how ATI V5800 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 157% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 150% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 183% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.38 8.25
Recency 26 April 2010 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Mobile has a 144% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 311% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
K2000D Quadro K2000D
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
HD 6350 6350
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
GeForce 820A 820A
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 X1900
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
RX Vega XTX Vega XTX
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Pro 5300 5300
ATI V5800 DVI FirePro V5800 DVI
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
ATI V5800 DVI FirePro V5800 DVI
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 3 GB Max-Q
ATI V5800 DVI FirePro V5800 DVI
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
ATI V5800 DVI FirePro V5800 DVI
vs
CMP 100HX-210 100HX-210
ATI V7800 FirePro V7800
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU 18-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5800 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.