GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs ATI FirePro V5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
V3700 V3750 V3800 V4800 V5700 V5800 V5800 DVI V7800 V8700 V8800 V9800 V9800P
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5800 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI V5800
2010, $479
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.38

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms V5800 by a whopping 707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking789237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency3.5226.26
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJuniperTU106B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)29 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002304
Core clock speed690 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1185 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate27.60170.6
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache80 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI V5800 3.38
RTX 2070 Max-Q 27.28
+707%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI V5800 1415
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11411
+706%
Samples: 2274

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−725%
99
+725%
1440p7−8
−757%
60
+757%
4K4−5
−875%
39
+875%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.92no data
1440p68.43no data
4K119.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 148
+0%
148
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Fortnite 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+0%
93
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100
+0%
100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+0%
36
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

This is how ATI V5800 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 725% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 757% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 875% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.38 27.28
Recency 26 April 2010 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 80 Watt

ATI V5800 has 8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 707% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla V100 SMX2 V100 SMX2
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 V100 SXM2
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB V100 SXM2 32 GB
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB V100 SXM2 16 GB
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Tesla V100 FHHL V100 FHHL
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Max-Q Refresh
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU 24-Core GPU
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
A100X
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Arc A380M A380M
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
CMP 100HX-210 100HX-210

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 397 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5800 or GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.