Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI FirePro V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV730Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 August 2008 (16 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors514 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)56 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4050.40
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2008 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 56 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 273.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5700 and Iris Plus Graphics 655. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5700 is a workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5700
FirePro V5700
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate FirePro V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 326 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.