RTX A2000 Max-Q vs FirePro V4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking883not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.47no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTurksGA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802560
Core clock speed800 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1207 MHz
Number of transistors716 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2096.56
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache48 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

FirePro V4900 has 26.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4900 and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4900 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 155 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4900 or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.