ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V3900 with Radeon X1650 GTO, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V3900
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 199 Watt
1.50
+733%

V3900 outperforms X1650 GTO by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10141464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.31no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameTurksRV530
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2012 (13 years ago)2 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed650 MHz587 MHz
Number of transistors716 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.602.348
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s12.54 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V3900 1.50
+733%
ATI X1650 GTO 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V3900 631
+753%
Samples: 167
ATI X1650 GTO 74
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 0.18
Recency 7 February 2012 2 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

FirePro V3900 has a 733.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro V3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 GTO in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 GTO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon X1650 GTO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 100 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or Radeon X1650 GTO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.