Radeon RX 6850M XT vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V3900 with Radeon RX 6850M XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V3900
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 199 Watt
1.66

RX 6850M XT outperforms FirePro V3900 by a whopping 2582% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking90069
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.21no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTurksNavi 22
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$110 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802560
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2463 MHz
Number of transistors716 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60413.0
Floating-point performance624.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V3900 and Radeon RX 6850M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V3900 1.66
RX 6850M XT 44.52
+2582%

Radeon RX 6850M XT outperforms FirePro V3900 by 2582% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V3900 641
RX 6850M XT 17191
+2582%

Radeon RX 6850M XT outperforms FirePro V3900 by 2582% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−2640%
137
+2640%
1440p3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%
4K2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 160
−2556%
4250−4300
+2556%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−2532%
2000−2050
+2532%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 159
−2573%
4250−4300
+2573%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−2576%
3800−3850
+2576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−2540%
2350−2400
+2540%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
−2547%
3600−3650
+2547%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2534%
2450−2500
+2534%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−2561%
2900−2950
+2561%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−2554%
4300−4350
+2554%
Hitman 3 90−95
−2537%
2400−2450
+2537%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−2565%
4850−4900
+2565%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−2545%
3200−3250
+2545%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−2570%
2750−2800
+2570%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 297
−2577%
7950−8000
+2577%
Watch Dogs: Legion 119
−2547%
3150−3200
+2547%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−2532%
2000−2050
+2532%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130
−2554%
3450−3500
+2554%
Battlefield 5 140−150
−2576%
3800−3850
+2576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−2540%
2350−2400
+2540%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
−2542%
2800−2850
+2542%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2534%
2450−2500
+2534%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−2561%
2900−2950
+2561%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−2554%
4300−4350
+2554%
Hitman 3 90−95
−2537%
2400−2450
+2537%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−2565%
4850−4900
+2565%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−2545%
3200−3250
+2545%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−2570%
2750−2800
+2570%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 259
−2564%
6900−6950
+2564%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
−2577%
5300−5350
+2577%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−2567%
2800−2850
+2567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−2532%
2000−2050
+2532%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 112
−2579%
3000−3050
+2579%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−2540%
2350−2400
+2540%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
−2544%
2300−2350
+2544%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2534%
2450−2500
+2534%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−2554%
4300−4350
+2554%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−2565%
4850−4900
+2565%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 227
−2565%
6050−6100
+2565%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122
−2564%
3250−3300
+2564%
Watch Dogs: Legion 83
−2551%
2200−2250
+2551%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−2570%
2750−2800
+2570%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−2570%
2350−2400
+2570%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−2567%
2800−2850
+2567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−2553%
1300−1350
+2553%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
−2547%
2250−2300
+2547%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−2581%
1850−1900
+2581%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
−2536%
1450−1500
+2536%
Far Cry 5 99
−2577%
2650−2700
+2577%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−2532%
2500−2550
+2532%
Hitman 3 55−60
−2527%
1550−1600
+2527%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−2577%
2650−2700
+2577%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−2522%
2150−2200
+2522%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
−2581%
4450−4500
+2581%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−2547%
1800−1850
+2547%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−2567%
1600−1650
+2567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−2562%
2050−2100
+2562%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−2509%
1200−1250
+2509%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−2464%
1000−1050
+2464%
Hitman 3 35−40
−2468%
950−1000
+2468%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−2572%
1550−1600
+2572%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−2468%
950−1000
+2468%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−2539%
1900−1950
+2539%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−2481%
800−850
+2481%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
−2560%
1250−1300
+2560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−2486%
750−800
+2486%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−2400%
650−700
+2400%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−2493%
700−750
+2493%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−2519%
1650−1700
+2519%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−2572%
1550−1600
+2572%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−2504%
1250−1300
+2504%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−2509%
600−650
+2509%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−2461%
1050−1100
+2461%

This is how FirePro V3900 and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is 2640% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6850M XT is 2667% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6850M XT is 2750% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 44.52
Recency 7 February 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 145 Watt

The Radeon RX 6850M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6850M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon RX 6850M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 93 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 210 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6850M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.