Radeon HD 7650M vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2270 2270 1GB Edition 2270 PCIe x1 V3900 V4900 FireStream 9370 V3800 V4800 V5800 V7800 V8800 V9800
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7510M 7530M 7550M 7570M 7590M 7630M 7650M 7670M 7690M 7690M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V3900 with Radeon HD 7650M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V3900
2012, $119
1 GB GDDR3, 199 Watt
1.51
+46.6%

V3900 outperforms HD 7650M by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
HD 7650M HD 7650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10221149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.333.97
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTurksThames
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (14 years ago)7 January 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480480
Core clock speed650 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data550 MHz
Number of transistors716 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6010.80
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2424
L1 Cache48 KB48 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1.1No outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V3900 1.51
+46.6%
HD 7650M 1.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V3900 627
+46.5%
Samples: 171
HD 7650M 428
Samples: 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
Full HD27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how FirePro V3900 and HD 7650M compete in popular games:

  • FirePro V3900 is 33% faster in 900p
  • FirePro V3900 is 42% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 38 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.51 1.03
Recency 7 February 2012 7 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 20 Watt

FirePro V3900 has a 47% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

HD 7650M, on the other hand, has 895% lower power consumption.

The FirePro V3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7650M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
HD 7650M Radeon HD 7650M
vs
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
ATI HD 5550 5550
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
FX 1800 1800
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
FX 1400 1400
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh 2060 Mobile Refresh
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
vs
RTX 4070 4070
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
GT 610 610
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 1030 DDR4
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile A4000 Mobile
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 6000 Blackwell Server
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile 710 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 102 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or Radeon HD 7650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.