Radeon Graphics 320SP vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1013not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.31no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTurksRenoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480320
Core clock speed650 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1400 MHz
Number of transistors716 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6028.00
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2420
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2012 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 7 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1226.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3900 and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 100 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or Radeon Graphics 320SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.