ATI FirePro V4800 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRenoirRedwood
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2020 (6 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320400
Core clock speed400 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0015.50
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2020
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2020 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 69 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics 320SP and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V4800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 64 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics 320SP or FirePro V4800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.