Radeon 780M vs ATI FirePro V3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated359
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Power efficiencyno data84.49
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRedwoodPhoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 April 2010 (15 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400768
Core clock speed650 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors627 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00139.2
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache40 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 186.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3800 and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 780M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 51 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2400 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3800 or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.