RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs FirePro S9170

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHawaiiAD107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date8 July 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28163072
Core clock speed930 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate163.7139.7
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPS8.94 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs17696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 July 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 35 Watt

FirePro S9170 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 685.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9170 and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9170 is a workstation card while RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.