Arc A370M vs FirePro S9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.82
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHawaiiDG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2014 (11 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed824 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate131.899.20
Floating-point processing power4.219 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache640 KB1.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2014 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 35 Watt

FirePro S9100 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2042.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9100 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9100
FirePro S9100
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate FirePro S9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9100 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.