GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs FirePro S9050

Place in performance ranking	366	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	30
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.40	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Tahiti	GN20-S7
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2014 (9 years ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price	$782	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2048
Core clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.8	189.1
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro S9050 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	254 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Form factor	full height / full length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −55.6%	42 +55.6%
1440p	18−20 −61.1%	29 +61.1%
4K	18−21 −66.7%	30 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−63.3%

49
+63.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −55.6%	42 +55.6%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −55.6%	42 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −56.4%	85−90 +56.4%
Hitman 3	27−30 −63%	44 +63%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −48%	70−75 +48%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −70%	50−55 +70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −50%	75 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −53.3%	46 +53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −66.7%	30 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −56.4%	85−90 +56.4%
Hitman 3	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −48%	70−75 +48%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −70%	50−55 +70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −55%	62 +55%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −65.7%	58 +65.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −62.9%	55−60 +62.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −56.3%	25 +56.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −56.4%	85−90 +56.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −48%	70−75 +48%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −57.1%	55 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −50%	18 +50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−70%

50−55
+70%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −54.2%	37 +54.2%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Hitman 3	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −61.9%	30−35 +61.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−47.6%

30−35
+47.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Hitman 3	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−60%

16−18
+60%

This is how FirePro S9050 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 56% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 61% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.69	18.66
Recency	7 August 2014	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt