Quadro RTX 5000 vs FirePro S9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S9000 and Quadro RTX 5000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro S9000
2012, $2,499
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
12.10

RTX 5000 outperforms S9000 by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.445.08
Power efficiency4.1312.32
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 August 2012 (13 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 5000 has 1055% better value for money than FirePro S9000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed900 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8348.5
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache448 KB3 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S9000 12.10
RTX 5000 36.90
+205%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9000 5059
Samples: 6
RTX 5000 15433
+205%
Samples: 997

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.10 36.90
Recency 24 August 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 230 Watt

RTX 5000 has a 205% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 52.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 242 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9000 or Quadro RTX 5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.